The Occupy Wall Street protests began about a month ago at Zuccotti Park, a financial district of Wall Street, and quickly spread across the country to other major cities.  Since the movement has made no formal demands, we are left reconstructing their beliefs on the basis of demographics and surveys of those who have participated.

What do we know about the movement?   The Wall Street Journal conducted the first known systematic poll of the Occupy Wall Street (OWS) movement giving us a glimpse of who they are.

For starters, we know they are younger than the Tea Party folks.  Sixty-four percent of them are under the age of thirty-four.  We also know a large contingent consists of union conglomerations, socialist groups, and self-described communists.

The survey showed that many OWS protesters were committed to left-wing policies and had overwhelming voted for President Obama in the 2008 presidential election.  Only 2% of OWS protesters identify themselves as Republican.

On Government and Taxes

The WSJ survey showed that 65% believe that the government has a moral obligation to provide health care, college education, and a secure retirement to all "no matter the cost."  Such views do not reflect 99% of the public according to recent polling.  And certainly 99% of us don't agree with the phrase "no matter the cost."  People interested in balancing their books typically don't use that sort of language when it comes to spending their money.

Naturally then, OWS activists are not terribly opposed to raising taxes.  Seventy-seven percent of OWS protesters want to tax the rich more, but 58% oppose raising taxes on the middle and lower classes.  Such ways of looking at economics doesn't pay off our debt.  As Congressman Paul Ryan put it, raising taxes on millionaires by 100% would only run our government about four months.

Interestingly, 85% of OWS protesters were employed.  This is a contrast from professional protesters that have been tailgating Governor Walker and Congressman Ryan.  They tell the media they're unemployed and Republican politicians aren't doing anything to find them a job.  Yet no one has thought to ask how they have the financial means to track down politicians from district to district.

On Violence, Drug Distribution, and Sexual Assault

And on a more disturbing note, 31% openly support the use of violence to advance an agenda.  Here are a few example abbreviated for simplicity.

At Time Square in New York, OWS protesters engaged in anti-Semitic rants and clashed with police throwing bottles and garbage at officers.  More than 800 protesters were arrested for blocking the entrance to the Brooklyn Bridge.  .

At Occupy Baltimore, organizers had to manage problems with sexual harassment.

At Occupy Seattle, a male protester indecently exposed himself to five children.

At Occupy Cleveland, a 19 year old female protester complained that she was raped by another protester inside a tent; she was later accused by organizers for being a plant to discredit their movement.

At Occupy Boston, two were arrested for dealing heroin in a tent; police found a child living with drug dealers.

At Occupy Dallas, there are reports of sexual assault concerning a 14 year old runaway; she passed herself off as a 19 year old to organizers.  The reports say she had sex with several men at the camp.  Separately, twenty-three protesters at Occupy Dallas were arrested for blockading the front doors of a Chase Bank branch by interlocking their arms.

And at Occupy Oakland, more than eighty protesters were arrested for illegal assembly.  Police had to clear out the large encampment due to sanitary and public safety issues.  Protesters threw bottles, rocks, and beer cans at police.  Other protesters even doused police with hazardous materials.  Subsequently, police responded with the use of tear gas and non-lethal projectiles.

Conclusion

When Tea Parties first took the stage nearly three years ago, there was much talk about bigotry and racism.  Protesters caught on tape bad-talking "illegals," and the media was all but eager to provide a stereotype.  You can disagree with their politics, but Tea Parties across the nation have been clean, nonviolent, and law abiding.

By the same standard, the leftist version of the Tea Party isn't quite matching up.  Why is there such a disparity in the behavior of these two groups?  Why is the OWS crowd having so many run-ins with the law?  Soon, we hope to take a closer look at this question.

 

 

 

 

 

The Tragedy in Arizona and the Complicit Media

A few days ago, a man by the name of Jared Loughner used a pistol to open fire on a gathering of people at an event in Tucson, Arizona dubbed "Congress on Your Corner." Reports indicate that 19 people were shot, 9 of which are currently in critical condition. Six died from gunshot wounds including a nine-year old girl and a federal judge. Congresswoman Gabrielle Gifford, who hosted the event, was shot in the head at point-blank range. Reports say that the bullet entered the back of her skull and exited out the front of her brow. Representative Gifford is currently in stable condition and is responding to questions in Tucson's Intensive Care Unit.

The incident, no doubt, has occurred during a turbulent time in Arizonan politics where immigration and health care have caused some stress points in their community. Not helping the situation are sensationalistic media outlets that have fed on speculation surrounding the event rather than on fact-finding.

The Media Narrative

Shortly after the shootings, Democrat County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik used a press conference to blame the rhetoric of anti-government groups for inciting the violent attack. Media outlets added their flavor to the story questing whether Sarah Palin or the Tea Party were to blame.

MSNBC, CNN, and New York Times highlighting Palin's Tea Party Express campaign that aimed at unseating Gifford during the midterm elections. Palin targeted Gifford's district, among several others, as a congressional seat ripe for turnover. Specifically, Palin's website used a "cross-hairs" graphic characteristic of rifles to identify Gifford's district. A few months ago, Gifford had complained about it saying that Palin's use of imagery might trigger violence. Was Gifford right?

An Evaluation of Jared Loughner

At the present time, information surrounding Jared Loughner's political views are somewhat convoluted. Many are trying to tie a political motive to his actions. Some say his views are right wing, some say they are leftist, and others say Loughner seems to be all over the spectrum. If he somehow identifies or sympathizes with the GOP, the media could have some real red meat for the public.

From Loughner's Myspace and Youtube rants, we're able to determine that his favorite readings, among others, were the Communist Manifesto and Mein Kampf. Both books promote the notion of big and intrusive government, which is an anathema to those in conservative circles. Loughner also favorited a Youtube video showing someone burning the American flag. Again, this is not a pastime for those on the right who envision themselves as patriotic.

Yet even more interestingly, Caitie Parker, a fellow student and friend of Loughner, described his views as "left wing" and "quite liberal." Parker said they were friends up until a 2007, but he became reclusive shortly after an alcohol poisoning.

But there are also some components of Loughner's political profile, according to some, that appear to be characteristic of a right-wing ideology. Loughner was suspicious of government playing "mind control games" on its citizens through linguistics. He also ranted against government on social media websites. Our conclusion is that the information needed to map out Loughner's political perspective is lacking.

Sheriff Clarence Dupnik's agenda

As the investigative process moves forward, what's not talked about is the mental health history of Jared Loughner. Apparently, Sheriff Dupnik - who had quickly laid the blame at the feet of conservatives and Rush Limbaugh - had received multiple complaints about Loughner making death threats.

At the Pima Community College, Loughner had five run-ins with campus police. He was eventually suspended and barred from the campus unless he had a letter from a mental health official attesting that he was not a danger to himself or others.

Over a half-dozen classmates had complained that they had not felt safe around Loughner. Sheriff Dupnik had also told reporters that Loughner's entire neighborhood was aware he was a troubled individual, including a neighbor who suspected he might be a serial killer. This of course raises the question of culpability for Sheriff Dupnik and his Deputies, who we are told have reassured people of their safety. It also begs the question of why Sheriff Dupnik blamed political groups for Loughner's actions rather than mental instability.

Party Politics

Democrats did not let a good crisis go to waste. Democrat Congressman Paul Kanjorski of Pennsylvania quickly penned an op-ed in the New York Times calling for an atmosphere of civility and respect. The assumption is that the killings in Arizona were a product of harsh political rhetoric. Yet, last year Kanjorski specifically told Floridians that instead of having gubernatorial candidate Rick Scott run for governor, he said they should,"Put him against the wall and shoot him."

It's tiresome to see politicians using the tragedies of others for political gain. The bodies of the deceased weren't even cold before the Democrat machine began to march forward with allegations against the Tea Party - an organization that has no known reports of violence. Other Democrats used the violence in Arizona to talk about gun control.

Rasmussen, a national polling agency, reports that most Americans view the shootings in Arizona as a random act of violence. Rasmussen also reports that 62% of Americans believe that stricter gun laws would not have prevented the shootings. This isn't a political issue. It's a story about an unbalanced individual who slipped through the cracks.

More Articles...